Just as with iPhoto, Apple has tried to make it easy to import your Aperture libraries into Photos ①. But the features of Photos differ significantly from those in Aperture, so some information from Aperture ends up in unexpected locations—and some data may not make the transition at all.
① The Photos version (right) of an Aperture library (left) retains most, but not all, of the previous library’s stuff.
The act of converting an Aperture library is identical to that of an iPhoto library. Rather than repeat everything here, I recommend first reading the instructions—and warnings—in the Import from iPhoto into Photos chapter.
If you have multiple Aperture libraries, hold down Option when you launch Photos to bring up the Choose Library dialog.
As with iPhoto, when you import an Aperture library into Photos, your existing library remains intact. The net result of the import is that you’ll have two separate libraries on your Mac’s drive: your old Aperture library and a new Photos library. They’ll even have the same name—unless your library contained the word Aperture, in which case you’ll see it replaced with the word Photos. (So a library called 2010 Aperture Library will be imported to a library called 2010 Photos Library.)
If you have a large library, you’re probably worried that a second version of the same library will take up twice the space. But in fact, importing an Aperture library into Photos uses very little additional disk space. See the sidebar Hard Facts about Hard Links, in the previous chapter, for the nerdy details.
Photos is a very different app from Aperture, but Apple has endeavored to transfer your data as best it can.
② Items are imported with geotagging data, but star ratings, flagged status, and even colors are converted into keywords.
Copyright © 2015, Jason Snell. All rights reserved.